Let it be a relief to you to hear that temptation is not sin. (Phew.)
Allow me to present to you a technical analysis of this concept of Temptation by Fr. John Laux, followed by a personal anecdote:
"In every temptation we can distinguish three steps: the occasion of the temptation, the temptation itself, and the outcome or issue.
a) The occasion of a temptation is either some external object that falls under our senses or some stimulus, feeling or emotion within us. By these the corresponding passions or desires are aroused. Since the desires cannot be satisfied without violating our moral duties, a conflict arises in our soul between passion and duty.
b) It is precisely this conflict that we call temptation. Our own evil passions are, therefore, the real source of every temptation. "Let no man, when he is tempted, say that he is tempted by God/ For God is not a tempter of evils, and He tempteth no man. But every man is tempted by his own concupiscence, being drawn away and allured." (James 1:13)
c) The temptation comes to an end at the moment when our will decides either for or against what we know to be our duty. Sometimes no decision is reached. The conflict continues for a time, and then dies out, either because the evil desire vanishes from our consciousness, or because our attention is interrupted and directed into other channels."
- Laux. pg. 44
What's the point in my sharing all of this? My latest faith pondering has been that of doubting my own salvation. Frankly, I'm no saint, and I've been known to think, say, and do things that certainly aren't very holy. (Then again, aren't we all?)
Reading that bit from Fr. Laux regarding temptation, I had a huge relief.
"Temptation is Not Sin:
...temptation is a conflict but no sin, not even an imperfection. Many are disquieted by the evil thoughts and suggestions which flash into their minds; they must remember that where the will withholds consent there is no sin. No matter how strong the temptation may be, or how long it may last, provided only our will remains true, there can be no question of sin."
- Laux. pg. 45
The desire to sin is not sinful.
The desire to sin is not sinful.
The desire to sin is not sinful.
YAY!
In fact:
"Temptation is useful.
Temptations are a great trial and burden, but we must not forget that God would not permit them unless they were useful in many ways. The Holy Ghost promises the victor's crown to all who have stood the test of temptation.
Temptation steels and fortifies the will. In temptation we become aware of our helplessness and learn to cast ourselves with humility and childlike trust into the arms of God...When there is conflict, a great saint has said, there is courage, vigilance, fidelity, wisdom, prudence, firmness, ardor, endurance."
- Laux. pg. 45
As a Catholic teen, my guards against sin always have to be up.
Sometimes I just walk out my door and feel like this guy:
YOU ALL NEED JESUS!!!!!!!!!!
With temptations ranging from, "Let's just wander over onto private property just for the heck of it," to "Let's go drink and break the law," to "We should totally set something on fire," to, "We should find someone to have meaningless relations with," to, "Let's get large slurpies and see who can drink them the fastest." Some of the temptations are moral dilemmas, while others are just stupid ideas.
So where's the line drawn, then? That line between temptation and sin, the line between stupid idea and bad idea?
There is a line between temptation and sin; that line between motivation and action. As Christians, it is out duty to determine that line for ourselves. Honestly, I can say that if I stayed in a tempting situation for too long, my course of action would be that of sin. Because I am weak, because I am human. But really, though temptation is unavoidable, it's my responsibility to decide when I need to make my graceful exit from the situation in order to avoid sin.
How do we determine our line?
I always try to ask myself these questions:
- Is what I am doing explicitly good?
- What follows logically as the next course of action?
- Is that action destructive to myself or the people around me?
- If they are not, do I know that they go against what Jesus taught/what the Catholic Faith teaches?
- Knowing that this is a temptation, where do I draw the line as "too close" to sin?
- How will I remove myself from the tempting situation when I approach that line?
I will now provide a hypothetical example:
Say that I begin a group project with an immensely attractive fellow around my age. (Score!) We exchange numbers and make some small talk, but he begins to act rather flirtatious. That, of course, is not bad in and of itself...but depending on what sort of fellow he is, what could come of it?
Conscience: Is what I am doing explicitly good?
Me: We could get married and bless the world with beautiful babies. That's good, isn't it?
Conscience: Oh come on now.
Conscience: Oh come on now.
Me: I'm kidding! Alright, no, it's not explicitly good. It doesn't make the world a better place.
Conscience: What would follow logically as the next potential course of action?
Me: We might talk about wanting to bless the world with beautiful babies...before marriage.
Conscience: There you go.
Conscience: Is that action destructive to myself or the people around me?
Me: Yes, but it would so be worth it.
Conscience: -.-
Me: don't look at me like that.
Conscience: It would most definitely not be worth it.
Me: ... Okay, fine, you're right, it wouldn't be.
Conscience: Good girl. *pats head*
Conscience: Does this go against what Jesus taught/what the Catholic Faith teaches?
Me: Well Jesus never said, "thou shalt not text flirtatiously."
Conscience: Yes, but he did say, "Do not cause your brother to stumble." (Romans 14:21)
Me: Right...so I need to be careful that what I say doesn't lead my brother in Christ to temptation of sin.
Conscience: Yep. Plus, just remember what the church teaches about-
Me: I know, I know, I wouldn't let that happen! ... but can I kiss him?
Conscience: Why would you want to do that?
Me: Why wouldn't I want to do that? Look at him!
Conscience: ... we will discuss this later.
Q: Where do I draw "the line"?
Me: I make sure that he knows where I stand regarding the matter of shenanigans before marriage.
Conscience: Good. And?
Me: We shouldn't talk about those things in detail, beyond light-hearted joking.
Conscience: Oh yes, the jokes...I could argue with you, but we'll take care of that later. Carry on.
Q: How will I remove myself from the tempting situation when I reach that line?
Me: I say NO.
Conscience: Good start, but is just shouting "no" really a significant plan?
Me: NO
Conscience: Okay, think of other possibilities here.
Me: If he asks for compromising pictures, I make a face, scream, decline, and then throw my phone in Holy Water. Or I could just send him a picture of a goat or something.
Conscience: ...Okay. How do you keep it from getting to that point?
Me: Change the subject the moment it goes down that path!
Me: Change the subject the moment it goes down that path!
Conscience: Do you have a list of conversation starters?
Me: "You have a nice face"?
Conscience: We need some work.
After an entertaining conversation with my inner self, I draw the conclusion that I need to proceed with caution. I establish the lines I'm not going to cross and figure out how to prevent potential sinfulness. Voila! A foolproof plan in sin...at least that's what I'd like to think. The world probably has other plans.
But as Christians, the least we can do is try.
In Christ,
Rebecca
Sources:
Laux, Fr. John. Catholic Morality. New York: Benziger Brothers Publishers, 1928.